MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

坚守教育形而上的芬芳情怀——读郑永年,《保卫社会》有感

2013· article· en· W34823886 on OpenAlexfundno aff
焦非非

Bibliographic record

Venue广东教育:综合版 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsLi Ka Shing Foundation
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

《保卫社会》是“郑永年看中国系列”评论文章的第一册,主要涵盖了作者反思有关社会问题和社会改革的文章,其中,他对中国教育改革问题的关注及定位让我产生了莫大共鸣。他将教育定位为社会经济矛盾最突出、最亟待改革的领域,正视教育面临着高投入低产出、与中国作为经济大国的地位极不匹配、也无助于中国经济竞争力和综合国力提高的尴尬境地.一针见血指出教育决策、教育考核与教育管理体制官僚化问题,提出了教育去行政化政治化、规制教育产业化、重视绩效评估结果、确立教育自治、提升中国国际知识链上的附加值等教育改革方向。一是关于教育公平问题。郑永年认为。教育不公的原因大多数还是和钱有关.农民自己的收入过低供应不起孩子的高中和大学的费用.政府对农村教育投入严重不足。从城市文化视野衡量和解决教育公平问题,本身就是有问题的。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.156
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue广东教育:综合版→Same topicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact→French-language works237,207→