MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Филогенетический анализ типовых штаммов плесеней roqueforti, camemberti рода Penicillium*

2010· article· en· W34877555 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Остроумов Лев Александрович, Садовая Татьяна Николаевна, Беспоместных Константин Владимирович

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Processing Techniques and Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntergenic regionBiologyPhylogenetic treeInternal transcribed spacerRibosomal RNAGeneticsIntraspecific competitionEvolutionary biologyRibosomal Intergenic Spacer analysisGeneZoologyGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The diversity in the structure of the sequence of 5.8, 18, 28S rRNA intergenic region (internal transcribed spacer or ITS-region) from various representatives of the genus Penicillium for revealing intraspecific variation in sequences of these genes and the possibility of using the results of this study with Molecular identification of closely related species of this genus. The objects of this study were the nucleotide sequences of 5.8, 18, 28S rRNA intergenic region 7 of the type strains of Penicillium, deposited in a database of NCBI. Multiple alignment of sequences and construction of phylogenetic tree conducted in the program ClustalW (www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/ ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood Processing Techniques and TechnologySame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207