MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W349532737

An Analysis of School Education Development of the Qiang Nationality in Recent One Hundred Years UNE ANALYSE DU DÉVELOPPEMENT DE L'ÉDUCATION SCOLAIRE DE LA NATIONALITÉ QIANG PENDANT CENT ANS RÉCENTS

2009· article· fr· W349532737 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ding-chu Wu, Zhu Sheng-Li, Lisha Liao

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChina's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNationalityChinaSchool educationVocational educationPolitical scienceQuake (natural phenomenon)SociologyEconomic growthImmigrationPedagogyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After May 12 Wenchuan massive earthquake,Qiang nationality was severely destroyed. China is all set to move in to save the quake-threatened culture of the Qiang people in Sichuan Province. Pay attention to the school education is an important aspect. It is significant to know the development of school education in recent one hundred years. During the period of the Republic of China,modern school education for the Qiang nationality developed. But the number of children of the Qiang nationality entering school was small and the education quality was low. After the founding of the People's Republic of China,a school education system serving the Qiang nationality has been gradually set up and education quality has been greatly improved. After 1992,the popularization of nine-year compulsory education has been realized,the scale of high school education has rapidly expanded,the structure readjustment of middle vocational and technical education has been accelerated and higher education has been developed stably.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicChina's Ethnic Minorities and RelationsFrench-language works237,207