MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W353118689 · doi:10.26537/rebules.v0i2.766

Ferramentas da Contabilidade de Gestão Estratégica

2017· article· pt· W353118689 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Hélder Martins Coelho

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Business and Legal Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBusiness and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessAgricultural sciencePolitical scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo apresenta uma abordagem genérica sobre as práticas da Contabilidade de Gestão Estratégica nomeadamente do custo alvo enquanto prática de gestão de custos. Salienla a origem e o desenvolvimento histórico do custo alvo no Japão e refere as diferentes dimensões e modalidades do sua implantação noutros países parficularmente nos E.U.A. e na Europa. Aponta as dificuldades da suautilização e analisa a importância da gestão de custos na fase de concepção e desenvolvimento de produtos novos, para as empresas que têm como objectivo a criação de valor para o cliente.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Business and Legal SciencesSame topicBusiness and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207