MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3531693 · doi:10.1055/s-2008-1050742

Marine Natural Products: Prospects and Impacts on the Sustainable Development in Indonesia

2008· article· en· W3531693 on OpenAlexaff
Ariyanti S. Dewi, Kustiariyah Tarman, Agustinus R. Uria, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and Coastal Ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioprospectingBusinessNatural resourceSustainable developmentGovernment (linguistics)Environmental planningMarine conservationMarine ecosystemEnvironmental resource managementBiodiversityNatural resource economicsMarine lifeEnvironmental protectionEcosystemGeographyEcologyBiologyEnvironmental scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indonesia is worldwide recognized as being the richest in the world in term of diversity and number of marine organisms. These resources are massive supplies for food and medicine. A large variety of biologically active compounds with great biomedical interest such as anticancer, antibiotic, antioxidant, anti-AIDS, anti-TBC and anti-Alzheimer have recently been discovered from Indonesian marine invertebrates including microorganisms associated with them. However, drug development from the sea is often hampered by the difficulty of obtaining sufficient supply. In the other hand, long term exploitation in coastal and coastal and marine resources has caused severe environmental degradation. Hence, maintaining a sustainable capacity for the ecosystem is an urgency need. Integrating efforts on sustainable utilization of marine natural products, diversity conservation and economic development as well as strengthening relationship among government, public and stakeholders into one program could give social and economical benefits to the local society and Indonesia in general. Index Term— Bioprospecting, Marine Natural Products, Sustainable development

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and Coastal EcosystemsFrench-language works237,207