MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Contribución a la medicina natural: Pohã Ñana, un Manuscrito inédito en Guaraní (Paraguay, S. XVIII)

2014· article· es· W35387868 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCorpus · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Después de cinco años de trabajo de transliteración, traducción e investigación hemos decidido hacer una breve presentación para describir en forma externa e interna el manuscrito Pohã Ñana (1725) atribuido a Marcos Villodas y presentar someramente también otro manuscrito denominado el Libro de medicina en lengua guaraní, sin fecha. Señalamos brevemente la similitud y la diferencia de contenido de los dos códices. Exponemos la traducción y análisis de dos ejemplos de terapias para enfermedades específicas en Pohã Ñana. No está claro en la actualidad si las fuentes existentes son extraídas de un tercer manuscrito, que pudo haber circulado en los pueblos de las reducciones jesuíticas del antiguo territorio paraguayo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it