China's Challenging the "Ricardo Law" Circle: Is World Development Inevitably Antagonistic or conflictive1/LE DÉFI LANCÉ PAR LA CHINE AU CERCLE DE LA « LOI DE RICARDO » -EST-CE QUE LE DÉVELOPPEMENT DU MONDE EST INÉVITABLEMENT ANTAGONISTE OU CONFLITIF ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: World historical development, especially the development of modern and contemporary globalization, tends to be antagonistic, conflictive and non-harmonious. Its theoretical demonstration is Law circle, namely the rule that social productivity development and historical progress are at the expense of certain social classes and strata. Western countries after the Second World War have hence changed partly in certain ideas, productivity and specific regulations. Will China be fettered by Law circle in our transformational socialism and has to apply the antagonistic, conflictive and non-harmonious method to achieve the alienating This paper analyzes the harmony and thoughts and policies of the western economics represented by Law in order to probe into our socialist social and economic harmony theory. Key words: Ricardo Law, harmony and thoughts of western economics, Harmonious Society Theory Resume: Le developpement historique du monde, notamment le developpement de la globalisation moderne et contemporaine, tend a s'averer antagoniste, conflictuel et non harmonieux. La demonstration theorique est le cercle de la « loi de Ricardo », a savoir la regle que le developpement de la force productive sociale et le progres social sont aux depens de certaines classes et souches sociales. Apres le Seconde guerre mondiale, les pays occidentaux ont change en partie certaines idees et des regulations specifiques. Est-ce que la Chine sera enchainee par la loi de Ricardo dans notre socialisme transformationnel et aura a appliquer la methode antagoniste, conflictuelle et non harmonieuse pour accomplir le developpement aliene ? Le present article analyse les pensees et politiques d'harmonie et de conflit des pays occidentaux, representees par la loi de Ricardo, dans le but d'explorer la theorie d'harmonie economique et sociale socialiste de notre pays. Mots-Cles: loi de Ricardo, pensees d'harmonie et de conflit des pays occidentaux, theorie de la societe harmonieuse regular phenomenon in our recorded world culture history up to now is: its development often appears antagonistic, conflictive and non-harmonious, with the common manifestations of social inequality and unfairness such as wide gap between the rich and the poor as well as unfair distribution, its extreme expression is violence and class struggle. The antithesis or conflict we mention here refers to external or outer antithesis, while the internal or inner antithesis, namely the self-contradiction, self-negation, self-antithesis or self-conflict, as well as the co-existence, unification, merging, melting and affinity of the two opposing sides within the same object are doubtlessly the dialectics of all movements4. Both modern globalization(originated from the capitalist primitive accumulation period) and the contemporary globalization(especially in late 20th century) behaved so5. This is also the perverseness dilemma between content and method. The contemporary economic globalization acquires multi natures, conflicts, crises and dual tendency. On the one hand, social productivity has made giants strides, the social technological pattern is stepping into a higher stage; Economic units, especially enterprises' patterns have undergone tremendous changes, which have improved strongly the closed economic system's transition or transformation to a global unitary economic system; Market patterns have revealed a tendency of domestic- international- global market, or a tendency from regional to international market. On the other hand, accompanying the reproducing of the capitalist productivity worldwide is the socialized process of self-sublation and self-negation. This is exactly the dialectics that Chinese scholars in Qing Dynasty have called One has to strengthen it first if you intend to weaken it. Will we adopt the antagonistic, conflictive and non-harmonious development in China's transformational socialist development? …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".