Interiorización de valores por los estudiantes de bioanálisis durante su formación profesional
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los avances en ciencia y tecnologia, el desarrollo de la comunicacion y su impacto en la sociedad demandan una educacion cuyo horizonte sea la formacion de la persona en la totalidad de sus dimensiones. Estas ideas orientaron la investigacion, con miras al analisis de los valores interiorizados por los estudiantes que cursan la carrera del Bioanalisis durante su proceso de aprendizaje. La orientacion teorica estuvo dirigida hacia la educacion en valores desde dimensiones filosoficas y epistemologicas bajo el enfoque fenomenologico, atendiendo a procedimientos inductivos segun la metodologia constructivista-cualitativa. La informacion se obtuvo a traves de tecnicas de Grupo Nominal. El escenario observacional estuvo representado por estudiantes del area de la salud. Los resultados develaron un sistema de valores finales interiorizados bajo el predominio del valor economico o utilitario; sobre los morales y afectivos, mientras en los valores instrumentales se aprecio una aproximacion hacia aquellos reguladores de una conducta integral humana consona con el ejercicio profesional de la salud
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".