MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W35600351 · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.865317

La mine Capelton : Dès les débuts de l’industrie minière

2002· article· en· W35600351 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shirley Lavertu

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire Québec · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is increasing evidence that coatomer protein complex subunit beta 2 (COPB2) plays an important role in various cancer types. This study explored the role and the downstream mediators of <i>COPB2</i> in prostate cancer (PCa). The expression of COPB2 was determined by the Cancer Genome Atlas database and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. COPB2 expression was upregulated in PCa tissues and correlated with Gleason score, biochemical recurrence, and poor prognosis. The functional roles of <i>COPB2</i> in PCa were verified through a series of experiments. Knocking down COPB2 expression inhibited the growth and clonogenesis of PCa cells, promoted cell apoptosis, and inhibited the ability of scratch repair, invasion of PCa cells, and tumor growth in Nude mice. To analyze downstream signaling pathways, ingenuity pathway analysis, GSEA, and whole-genome expression spectrum GeneChip analysis were used. Western blot revealed that COPB2 expression promoted the proliferation and invasion of PCa cells by regulating the MAPK/TGF-β signaling pathway. The interacting protein (nuclear protein 1, NUPR1) was identified <i>via</i> Co-IP, real-time PCR, Western blot, and TCGA database in sampled tissues. The expressions of the interaction proteins NUPR1 and COPB2 were negatively regulated by each other. <i>COPB2</i> could be a new biomarker for PCa diagnosis and monitoring and to provide a theoretical basis for identifying effective drug intervention targets through in-depth mechanistic studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire QuébecSame topicMining and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207