MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W357163608 · doi:10.1016/j.crte.2015.04.002

Use of major ion and stable isotope geochemistry to delineate natural and anthropogenic sources of nitrate and sulfate in the Kettle River Basin, British Columbia, Canada

2015· article· en· W357163608 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueComptes Rendus Géoscience · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGroundwaterSurface waterKettle (birds)Environmental scienceAquiferNitrateHydrology (agriculture)Water qualityDrainage basinGeologyEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental engineeringEcologyChemistryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Kettle River Basin in South central British Columbia (Canada) is under increasing anthropogenic pressures affecting both water quantity and quality of surface waters and aquifers. We investigated water quality and sources and processes influencing NO 3 – and SO 4 2– in the Kettle River Basin using a combination of chemical and isotopic techniques. The dominant water type in the Kettle River Basin is Ca–HCO 3 with surface waters having total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations of &lt; 115 mg/L and groundwaters having TDS values of up to 572 mg/L. Based on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>15</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msub> <mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>18</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msub> <mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> values and concentration data, NO 3 – in surface waters originates primarily from natural soil nitrification processes, with additional influences from anthropogenic activities, such as waste water effluents at sampling locations downstream from population centres. The source of NO 3 – in groundwater was predominantly nitrification of soil organic matter, although nitrate in a few groundwater samples originated from anthropogenic sources, including manure or septic systems. The dominant source of SO 4 2– in surface water and groundwater samples was the natural oxidation of sulfide minerals. With increasing distance downstream, surface water <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>δ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>18</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:msub> <mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> values increase beyond the range of oxidation of sulfide minerals and into the range of soil and atmospheric-derived SO 4 2– that is in part derived from anthropogenic emissions. Hence, we conclude that recent anthropogenic impacts have affected water quality only marginally at only few sites in the Kettle River Basin. The presented data will serve as an excellent baseline against which future impacts can be assessed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it