Bibliographic record
Abstract
It compared from a structural scheme the regulatory and politician component about the cases of genetically modified food and biofuels based on agricultural commodities in Colombia, Peru, Venezuela and Cuba during the study period 2002-2008. It determines which cases there is a pattern of governance and governance in which both environmental and agricultural interests of energy I determine which of the four cases are affirmed to compare the concepts of food sovereignty and/ or energy. On the issue of policies to compare the objectives are the pursuit of variables that explain the similarities and differences of related public policies, regulations on the subject of legal formants are taken of the countries surveyed in the period 2002-2008 with a view to establish legal transplants and receptions associated with those policies. The conclusion in the case studies receiving transplant from an environmental perspective to the provisions of international treaties on the matter from the Rio Biodiversity Convention and 92 of the Cartagena Biosafety Protocol, Montreal. In agriculture associated with the adoption biofuels majority concluded in the cases studied a model of agro-business and approach the energy issue to the topic of energy sovereignty in the case of Venezuela and Cuba.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".