MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3590634

Public Health: Snowmobile injuries

2003· article· en· W3590634 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
John Hoey

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Farm Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpidemiologyPublic healthInjury preventionOccupational safety and healthMedical examinerMedical emergencyPoison controlEnvironmental healthDemographyPathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and epidemiology: Again this winter, people are killing and injuring themselves while riding snowmobiles. The Canadian Institute for Health Information noted that, in the winter of 2000/2001, there were 137 admissions to hospital because of severe injuries from snowmobiling and 9 related deaths in trauma centres.1 These reports probably underestimate actual events because they are based only on hospital data. Several US states have laws requiring snowmobile operators to report all incidents involving snowmobiles that result in injury requiring medical attention or property damage. In Maine, from 1991 to 1996, there were 1355 snowmobile-related incidents that resulted in 903 injuries among 2105 operators and passengers.2 On average, there were 5.4 deaths per winter season during this period. There is no information on risk factors because case–control studies have yet to be done. However, in the Maine report,2 snowmobile-related incidents resulting in injury, death or property damage were more frequent during darker hours (4 pm to 6 am) than at other times. Not surprisingly, most of the operators and injured people were men (95% of those who died). Of the 1255 incidents in which the role of alcohol was evaluated, alcohol was a contributing factor in 13% of the incidents and 41% of the deaths. The primary causes were known for 1311 of the incidents and included excessive speed (52% of cases), inattention or careless operation (27%), operating on a public way (2%), operating on a steep hill or snow bank (2%) and crossing unsafe ice (1%). Of the 39 deaths, 82% resulted from trauma and 18% from drowning. In some provinces in Canada young children are legally permitted to operate snowmobiles, and legal restrictions on the use of snowmobiles on private property often do not apply. In an analysis of 291 snowmobile-related injuries and deaths involving children in the United States between 1990 and 1998, most (26%) involved ejection from the snowmobile;3 a large proportion of the events (43%) occurred on private property. Clinical management: In the cases reported from Maine, the most common injuries were fractures (32%), lacerations and contusions (17%), and concussions (4%). Clinicians should be alert to the possibility of concomitant alcohol consumption and hypothermia among snowmobile trauma victims. Prevention: Provincial laws governing snowmobile use include regulations for the minimum age of operators, registration of snowmobiles, wearing of helmets, speed limits and use of public roadways. However, because most snowmobile-related injuries and deaths occur off public roadways and because police have insufficient resources to patrol snowmobile trails, snowmobile clubs have attempted to fill the gaps through education programs, such as the Alberta Snowmobile Association's Sled Smart program offered in rural schools (www.altasnowmobile.ab.ca/safety/safety.html). In Ontario the provincial police, in collaboration with the Ontario Federation of Snowmobile Clubs and municipal police services, have delegated some enforcement power to qualified club members through its STOP (Snowmobile Trail Officer Patrol) program (www.stopofficer.com). Such law enforcement may be effective in reducing snowmobile-related injuries and deaths.4 There appear to be no published studies of efforts to reduce injuries by means used with other motor vehicles, such as design changes, limiting engine horsepower and velocity potential, education programs, improving trails or placing warning signs on dangerous sections of trails, or raising the age requirement for operation of a vehicle. John Hoey CMAJ

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicAgriculture and Farm SafetyFrench-language works237,207