Reflection and Transmission Characteristics of Porous Rubble-Mound Breakwaters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Minimally invasive colorectal surgery has been an entity for just over 30 years. Compared with traditional open surgery, minimally invasive surgery has the advantages of less trauma, more delicate operation and faster postoperative recovery. At present, minimally invasive surgery for colorectal tumor shows a diversified trend in terms of surgical approach, surgical platform or surgical methods. Besides, standardized comprehensive treatment and immunotherapy have had far-reaching impacts on the development of minimally invasive surgery. The diagnosis and treatment of perioperative complications is still another important topic in the research of minimally invasive surgery in the future. In addition to the short-term outcomes, the most important thing that patients truly require and emphasize is the permanence of the curative effect, that is, long-term survival and good defecation, urination and sexual function. Thus, permanence is the ultimate goal of minimally invasive surgery. To achieve this, we should strive to correct improper treatment methods, rationally select applicable groups of emerging surgical approaches and surgical platforms, pay more attention to comprehensive tumor diagnosis and treatment, and prudently carry out new technology research on the basis of the basic concept of patient safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it