Sound, Space and Selfhood: Stereoscopic Apprehension in The <i>Paradise Institute</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'installation cinématographique The Paradise Institute de Janet Cardiff et George Bures Miller, représentant le Canada à la biennale de Venise en 2001, consiste en un tout petit théâtre dans lequel le spectateur regarde un fragment de quatorze minutes d'un film à suspense européen. Par ses écouteurs, te spectateur entend à la fois la bande sonore du film et le son d'autres spectateurs, reproduit par enregistrement binaural, qui suggère leur présence dans le théâtre. La démarcation entre le film et le spectateur disparaît à mesure que ce dernier devient impliqué dans un film noir parallèle. L'installation met en évidence certains aspects importants de l’expérience cinématographique, comme les rapports entre le son et l'espace, l'influence du lieu de projection sur la perception du spectateur et l'interaction entre le phantasme privé et la narration du film dans le processus d'identification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".