MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W36310909 · doi:10.36834/cmej.73051

Avaluació de l'adquisició de procediments científics per part de l'alumnat de 4t d'ESO i de 2n de Batxillerat a les Illes Balears. 'Evaluación de la adquisión de procedimientos científicos por parte del alumnado de 4o de ESO y de 2o de Bachillerato en las Islas Baleares'

2009· article· es· W36310909 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Albert Catalán Fernández, Antonio Casero Martínez, Miquel Catany Escandell, Miquel Palou Sampol, Pere Josep Palou Mas, Catalina Ponsell Vicens, Maria Antònia Soberats Sagreras, Guillem Ramon Pérez de Rada, Agustí Vergés Aguiló

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Education Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational methodologies and cognitive development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumen tomado del autor. Incluye tablas de datos. Se adjuntan anexos sobre definicion y ejemplos sobre procedimientos seleccionados y pruebas de evaluacion de la adquisicion de procedimientos cientificos para alumnado de 4o de ESO y 2o de Bachillerato

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.048
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.048
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Education JournalSame topicEducational methodologies and cognitive developmentFrench-language works237,207