MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multi-Objective Design Optimisation of a Class of Parallel Kinematic Machines

2009· article· en· W36351830 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ilya Tyapin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthEuropean Commission
KeywordsKinematicsWorkspaceCartesian coordinate systemKinematic diagramComputer scienceFinite element methodPosition (finance)StiffnessControl theory (sociology)Topology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmMathematicsGeometryKinematic chainEngineeringArtificial intelligencePhysicsStructural engineeringRobotClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the main advantages of the Gantry-Tau machine is a large accessible workspace\footprint ratio compared to many other parallel machines. The Gantry-Tau improves this ratio further by allowing a change of assembly mode without internal link collisions or collisions between the links and the moving TCP platform. In this Thesis some of the features of the Gantry-Tau structure are described and results are presented from the analysis of the kinematic, elastostatic and elastodynamic properties of the PKM. However, the optimal kinematic, elastostatic and elastodynamic design parameters of the machine are still difficult to calculate and this thesis introduces a multi-objective optimisation scheme based on the geometric approach for the workspace area, unreachable area, joint angle limitations and link collisions as well as the functional dependencies of the elements of the static matrix and the Laplace transform to define the first resonance frequency and Cartesian and torsional stiffness. The method to calculate the first resonance frequency assumes that each link and universal joint can be described by a mass-springdamper model and calculates the transfer function from a Cartesian (TCP) force or torque to Cartesian position or orientation. The geometric methods involve the simple geometric shapes (spheres, circles, segments, etc) and vectors. The functional dependencies are based on the properties between the kinematic parameters. These approaches are significantly faster than analytical methods based on the inverse kinematics or the general Finite Elements Method (FEM). The reconfigurable Gantry-Tau kinematic design obtained by multi-objective optimisation gives the following features: • Workspace/footprint ratio more than 3.19. • First resonance frequency greater than 48 Hz. • Lowest Cartesian stiffness in the workspace 5N/μm. • The unreachable space in the middle of the workspace is not detected. • No link collisions. The results show that by careful design of the PKM, a collision free workspace without the unreachable area in the middle can be achieved. High stiffness and high first resonance frequency are important parameters for the the Gantry-Tau when used in industrial applications, such as cutting, milling and drilling of steel or aluminium and pick-and-place operations. These applications require high static and dynamic accuracy in combination with high speed and acceleration. The optimisation parameters are the support frame lengths, actuator positions,endeffector kinematics and the robot’s arm lengths. Because of the fast computational speed of the geometric approaches and computational time saving of the methods based on the functional dependency, they are ideal for inclusion in a design optimisation framework, normally a nonlinear optimisation routine. In this Thesis the evolutionary algorithm based on the complex search method is used to optimise the 3-DOF Gantry-Tau. The existing lab prototype of this machine was assembled and completed at the University of Agder

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207