MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La creación ya no es lo que era y el libro, tampoco

2008· article· en· W36418179 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Roser Lozano

Bibliographic record

VenueAnuario ThinkEPI · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries, Manuscripts, and Books
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El libro y las bibliotecas públicas están inmersos en una sociedad en continua transformación e influidas por una creciente comercialización de la cultura donde confluyen intereses comerciales y sociales. Las bibliotecas públicas, como servicio público, deben servir a un interés social aunque en su intento de llegar más y mejor al ciudadano asuman, como las librerías, aspectos comerciales en la prestación de sus servicios

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.090 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnuario ThinkEPISame topicLibraries, Manuscripts, and BooksFrench-language works237,207