MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W36426857

Effect of Salt Stress on Oat Seed Germination and Seeding Membrane Permeability

2009· article· en· W36426857 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Junying Wu, Jinghui Liu, Qian Li, Zengjuan Fu

Bibliographic record

VenueMailei zuowu xuebao · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalt (chemistry)HorticultureChemistryNuclear chemistryBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analyzing t he eff ect s of t he salt o n oat seed ger mi natio n , seedli ng growt h and seedli ng leaves membrane per meabilit y can p ro vide t heo retical ref erence fo r salt resi st ance breedi ng and salt2tolerant p hys2 iolo gical research of oat . The eff ect s of different co ncent ratio n of NaCl and Na2 SO4 do uble salt sol utio n st ress o n t he seed ger mi natio n and seedli ng abilit y of salt tolerance of seven oat varieties were st udied usi ng t he st andar d block met ho d. Acco r di ng to analysi s of salt tolerance i ndexes , it was o bt ai ned t hat salt i nhi bi2 t ed seed ger mi natio n and seedli ng growt h alo ng wit h t he i ncrease of salt co ncent ratio n , t he relative ger mi2 natio n rat e , ger mi natio n i ndex and relative si mple activit y i ndex , seedli ng root lengt h and plant height re2 duced gradually , membrane per meabilit y of leaves i ncreased. Relative ger mi natio n rat e , ger mi natio n i ndex and relative si mple activit y i ndex were t he mai n i ndexes of salt tolerance. Amo ng t he 7 oat varieties , Baiy2 an 2 and Suweiai 339 were mo st tolerant to salt , Avena magna and Nei no ngdayo u 1 had mo derat e tolerance to salt . Canada 2 , Si bsiae and Yuan 294 were no n2tolerant .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMailei zuowu xuebaoSame topicAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop ManagementFrench-language works237,207