MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W36438276 · doi:10.19177/rcc.v9e1201413-28

Canção popular: notas sobre a revocalização do logos

2014· article· pt· W36438276 on OpenAlexaff
Leonardo Davino de Oliveira

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Crítica Cultural · 2014
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian cultural history and politics
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLogos Bible SoftwareHumanitiesArtPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabalho tem o objetivo de debater o processo de emudecimento do logos poético ao longo do tempo, a partir da análise de algumas canções populares. Apoiados nas observações levadas a público por Adriana Cavarero no livro Vozes plurais: filosofia da expressão vocal (2011), investigamos a presença dos “animais vocálicos”, tomando como exemplo a conhecida fábula da formiga e da cigarra de La Fontaine, passamos pelas avaliação da lírica como “voz do coração” e audição das sereias “mulheres que cantam” como signos da ontologia da poesia e da canção popular, até a polifonia vocal da mitopoética de Macunaíma, como representante de um ensaio sobre o Brasil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Crítica CulturalSame topicBrazilian cultural history and politicsFrench-language works237,207