MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W364756047

Chinatowns around the world : gilded ghetto, ethnopolis, and cultural diaspora

2013· book· en· W364756047 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bernard P. Wong, Chee Beng Tan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinatownDiasporaImmigrationArt historyChinaHistoryChinese americansPortraitNarrativeCartographyArtHumanitiesGeographySociologyGender studiesArchaeologyLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Chinatowns around the World Bernard Wong Chapter One Vancouver in Transition Peter S. Li and Xiaoling Li Chapter Two From Mott Street to East Broadway: Fuzhounese Immigrants and the Revitalization of York's Kenneth J. Guest Chapter Three The Trends in American The Case of the Chinese in Chicago Huping Ling Chapter Four Sydney: A Window on the Chinese Community Christine Inglis Chapter Five The in Peru and the Changing Peruvian Chinese Communities Isabelle Lausent-Herrera Chapter Six Havana: One Hundered and Sixty Years below the Surface Adrian H. Hearn Chapter Seven Problematizing Chinatowns: Conflicts and Narratives Surrounding Chinese Quarters in and around Paris Chuang Ya-Han and Anne-Christine Tremon Chapter Eight Chinatown-Lisbon? Portrait of a Globalizing Present over a National Background Paula Mota Santos Chapter Nine Ikebukuro in Tokyo: The First New Chinatown in Japan Yamashita Kiyomi Chapter Ten A Reflection Tan Chee-Beng

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207