MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W36478636 · doi:10.1002/cphc.202200731

A Matrix Based Approach For Modeling Robotic Swarm Behavior.

2006· article· en· W36478636 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sarosh Hashmi, Waqar Mahmood

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSwarm behaviourComputer scienceMatrix (chemical analysis)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract- Swarm robotics systems can be categorized as discrete event systems (DES) and can therefore be subjected to DES modeling and analysis tools. Taking on the same approach and considering successful application of matrices to model complex DES like flexible manufacturing systems, we present here a novel matrix formulation to model emergent coherent movement of a wirelessly connected swarm of robots. In order to move the swarm in a desired direction, an external control input is defined that changes the direction of every robot to desired direction. This approach can be applied not only to model swarm dynamics but also to quickly verify its emergent behavior. The simulation in MATLAB gives interesting insight into emergent behavior of the swarm over time, which other wise requires expensive experimentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Artificial IntelligenceSame topicGene Regulatory Network AnalysisFrench-language works237,207