L'évolution du statut de la femme en droit québécois : entre tradition et modernité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le present travail se propose de suivre l'evolution historique du statut de la femme Quebecoise en passant en revue des concepts ordinaires de droit prive : La tutelle, la filiation, l'emancipation, l'incapacite, le mandat, le douaire, le mariage, le divorce. L'originalite que nous proposons est de meler certains traits historiques particuliers au Quebec a cette analyse juridique. Le passage des Francais dans la province de Quebec, a laisse une empreinte, autant juridique que religieuse. Cet attachement au droit civil francais se traduit par le refus du Quebec de l'application des regles de Commom law, pourtant applique au Canada. L'evolution des mentalites qui ont bouleverse les schemas de pensee traditionnels, les modes de vie seculaires, et les actions des groupes feministes ont oblige le legislateur a reformer le droit civil quebecois et ainsi repenser le statut juridique des femmes. Le gouvernement federal a suivi cette demarche, en adoptant des mesures legislatives visant a ameliorer la situation des femmes dans la societe canadienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".