MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W366043348 · doi:10.1353/sais.2015.0006

In Search of a Slingshot: Climate Action’s David and the Goliath of Deregulated Capitalism

2015· article· en· W366043348 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emily Walz

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œSAIS review of international affairs · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Geoengineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapitalismPoliticsClimate changePopulationPovertyPolitical sciencePolitical economyEnvironmental ethicsEconomic historyHistorySociologyEcologyLawDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Search of a Slingshot:Climate Action’s David and the Goliath of Deregulated Capitalism Emily Walz (bio) Klein, Naomi. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 2014. In the middle of the Pacific Ocean, the island of Nauru is a gutted shell, its interior rock, primarily phosphate of lime, long ago hauled away to be used as agricultural fertilizer in Australia and New Zealand. Financially and ecologically bankrupt, Nauru’s population has been reduced to living on an ever-shrinking strip of land. They are part of what author Naomi Klein calls the expanding “sacrifice zone,” those areas of the planet suffering the harshest development-related ecological degradation and the worst effects of climate change. Caught between the costs of rampant extractivism—the large-scale removal of minerals and raw materials from the earth, often for export—and a coming climate crisis, Nauru’s leaders have gone public, using their story as a cautionary tale so that other nations might act to avoid similar fates. Nauru is one of the cases in Klein’s 2014 book This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate, a wide-ranging exploration of the intersection of climate science and the dynamics of the international political and economic systems that prevent climate issues from meriting top billing on the global political agenda. In Klein’s view, climate change is not just another issue; it is the issue to end all issues, with links to the anti-globalization and anti-corporation arguments at the center of her other books, The Shock Doctrine (2007) and No Logo (1999). Deregulated capitalism, as the world’s dominant economic system with its attendant demands for continual growth, is on a collision course with the finitelyresourced planet that houses it. Klein makes clear that only one of these factors can change: nature or the economic model; and it will not be nature. The litany of climate change casualties is familiar: rising sea levels, intensifying severe weather patterns, acidifying oceans, disruption to harvests and supply chains, and swells of climate migrants and refugees. Those who agree that danger [End Page 205] is imminent and that now is the time for action include more than scientists and small island nations; the International Energy Agency wrote in 2012, “the climate goal of limiting warming to 2°C is becoming more difficult and more costly with each year that passes.”1 The World Bank too has sounded alarms, warning that there is “no certainty that adaptation to a 4°C world is possible.”2 Even Catholic bishops have called for halts at 1.5°C—a more progressive emissions target than negotiators within the international system have ever incorporated into proposals for ratification by member states.3 Meanwhile, the fossil fuel industry is working to bring extraction to new extremes, pulling crude bitumen from Alberta’s Athabasca oil sands and suing to overturn local bans on hydraulic fracturing. The major energy companies already hold enough conventional fossil fuel in reserves to far exceed estimates of the planet’s atmospheric capacity to absorb carbon, meaning that the addition of these new, unconventional methods for obtaining further supplies—which extrexact a higher environmental cost in extraction than their conventional counterparts—may push potential carbon consumption far beyond pivotal thresholds. The irreconcilability of the shrinking emissions needed to avoid disastrous climate consequences with these growing pools of exploitable fossil fuels is exacerbated by an economic system not built to take environmental externalities into account and incapable of holding polluters fully accountable. Separate from fossil fuel sector interests, Klein cites whole industries of “disaster capitalists” preparing to seize profit opportunities. Disaster insurers, climate futures traders, weapons manufacturers, security corporations, upscale disaster-ready housing construction firms, and multinational agrochemical and biotechnology companies preparing “climate-ready” seed varietals are among those poised to benefit from climate change-related dramatic environmental events. The dismal picture Klein paints is enough for overload; even she admits to having indulged the impulse to look away when faced with evidence of the gravity of the situation. But in This Changes Everything, Klein confronts these issues head on, grappling with the question “What is really preventing us from putting out the fire...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.012
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œSAIS review of international affairsSame topicClimate Change and GeoengineeringFrench-language works237,207