MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transformación de zonas portuarias y costeras en desuso: Experiencias, posibilidades y problemas

2018· article· es· W3687918 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCiudades · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyCartographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El concepto de revitalización urbana se aplica a procesos y planteamientos muy diferentes relacionados con la actuación sobre áreas costeras y portuarias obsoletas de todo el mundo. Se trata de actuaciones todas ellas con una gran trascendencia sobre la estructura general de las ciudades pero, a menudo, sus objetivos son muy distintos e incluso contradictorios. El artículo analiza algunos de los proyectos de revitalización portuaria más conocidos y los clasifica en función de su meta característica: fortalecimiento de la economía local (Londres, Melbourne), reordenación del espacio urbano (Boston, Shanghai, Hong Kong), rehabitalización urbana (Vancouver), práctica de nuevas culturas de planeamiento (Nueva York, Rotterdam), desarrollo de nuevos usos (Oslo, Génova, Amsterdam) o recuperación del patrimonio (Copenhage, Chicago).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it