The rising village and Acadia: representations of the Canadian Maritimes before Evangeline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow s Evangeline has inÁ uenced the construction of images the Canadian Maritimes.While Evangeline s Acadian-oriented literary images of the Maritimes came to be a part of commercial image of the area and have attracted serious academic attention, the earlier literary images of the area unaffected by Evangeline have been less studied.Therefore, this article attempts to explore two of the representative long poems written in English before the publication of Evangeline: Oliver Goldsmith s The Rising Village and Joseph Howe s Acadia to reveal the images of Canadian Maritimes untouched by the American poem.Unlike Evangeline, which focuses on Acadians in the eighteenth century, the early Canadian poems do not willingly refer to the French people who had been living there before the arrival of British settlers to emphasize the Britishness of the Maritimes:Goldsmith totally ignores French culture and fancifully invents a British colony from the wilderness; Howe also starts the narrative of the European settlement in the Maritimes with the arrival of the British although he shows sympathy for Acadians who lost their homeland in their battles with the British.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".