La tradición en la Gnosis Valentiniana y en la Iglesia Prenicena
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) is a neurologic disorder with generally well-known clinical manifestations. However, few studies assessed their progression rate using a longitudinal design. This study aimed to document the natural history of ARSACS over a 4-year period in terms of upper and lower limb functions, balance, walking capacity, performance in daily living activities, and disease severity. Forty participants were assessed on three occasions over 4 years. Participant performance was reported in raw data as well as in percentage from reference values to consider the normal aging process. Severe balance and walking capacity impairments were found, with a significant performance decrease over the 4 years. Balance reached a floor score of around 6 points on the Berg Balance Scale for participants aged >40 years, while other participants lost about 1.5 points per year. The mean loss in walking speed was 0.044 m/s per year and the mean decrease in the distance walked in 6 min was 20.8 m per year for the whole cohort. Pinch strength, balance, walking speed, and walking distance decreased over time even when reported in percentage from reference values. Major impairments and rapid progression rates were documented in the present study for upper limb coordination, pinch strength, balance, and walking capacity in the ARSACS population. A progression rate beyond the normal aging process was observed. These results provide fundamental insights regarding the disease prognosis that will help to better inform patients, develop specific rehabilitation programs, and improve trial readiness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it