MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W372017340

"His Paper Family Knew Their Place": Diasporic Space in Wayson Choy's All That Matters

2011· article· en· W372017340 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Alena Chercover

Bibliographic record

VenuePostcolonial text · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaChinatownSpace (punctuation)Resistance (ecology)SociologyAgency (philosophy)Gender studiesAestheticsHistoryGenealogyArtLinguisticsPhilosophySocial scienceArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contrary to the notion that mobility is implicit in diaspora, this essay contends that mobility post-migration, that is, the movement of individual bodies in hostland diasporic populations, often becomes severely restricted. As a case in point, I examine the diasporic space of Vancouver's Chinatown in Wayson Choy's novel All that Matters (2004). I argue that while movement may be an inevitable precondition of diaspora, mobility, hindered by ethnic, gender, and class borders, remains largely illusory in Chinese diaspora space. In the second half of this essay I ask where, if at all, resistance can be located; is movement perpetually restricted in the diaspora space of Choy's Chinatown, or is there a possibility for individual agency? To answer this question, I propose that our focus must shift from the study of bodies in the diaspora to the role that things play in the diaspora. In particular, paper plays a pivotal role in Choy's novel and deserves close attention for the ways it is bound up with questions of mobility and immobility. I suggest that in order to locate mobility and resistance in the Chinese diaspora, we must first challenge the ontological borders between animate and inanimate, body and thing, human and paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePostcolonial textSame topicTravel Writing and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207