MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W37358953 · doi:10.1177/014833311306200209

Raising <i>The Rock</i>: The Importance of T. S. Eliot's Pageant-Play

2013· article· en· W37358953 on OpenAlex
Hazel Atkins

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChristianity & Literature · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicModernist Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaising (metalworking)Reading (process)AestheticsFunction (biology)SociologyArtLawPolitical scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

T. S. Eliot's The Rock was written as part of a fundraising campaign to assist the Forty-Five Churches Fund to build new churches in London's suburbs. The pageant play has to-date received little critical attention partly due to the fact that it was a commissioned piece, and partly due to its undeniable flaws. A thoroughgoing reassessment of the important place the play holds in Eliot's oeuvre is therefore long overdue. I aim to show that an attentive re-reading of The Rock in its church setting is indispensable for gaining a full understanding of the development of Eliot's post-conversion ideas about community, tradition, and the ritual function of art.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it