Building a sustainable future : proceedings of the 2009 Construction Research Congress, April 5-7, 2009, Seattle, Washington
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Construction Research Congress 2009 contains 152 peer-reviewed papers presented at the conference held in Seattle, Washington, April 5-7, 2009. Sixteen countries were represented: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Hong Kong, India, Israel, Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, Thailand, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. The papers are organized into general state-of-knowledge research areas in construction engineering and management. Topics discussed include: project control, general Operations issues, procurement and contracting, organizational leadership and management, advances in project planning, design, and construction, sustainable construction and facilities, project risks and safety, project planning and control, project/process integration and improvement, lean construction, quantitative methods and models, infrastructure management and disaster mitigation, underground construction, construction simulation, education, and research methods. This proceedings is invaluable to construction engineers and researchers, contractors, and others involved in the field of construction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".