Parliamentary Opposition in Old and New Democracies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction 1. Studying Parliamentary Opposition in Old and New Democracies: Issues and Perspectives Ludger Helms Part I: Parliamentary Opposition in Old Democracies 2. Parliamentary Opposition in Westminster Democracies: Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand Andre Kaiser 3. Parliamentary Opposition under Minority Parliamentarism: Scandinavia Flemming Juul Christiansen and Erik Damgaard 4. Parliamentary Opposition in Post-Consocational Democracies: Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands Rudy B. Andeweg, Lieven De Winter and Wolfgang C. Muller 5. Parliamentary Opposition under (Post-)One-Party Rule: Japan Takashi Inoguchi Part II: Parliamentary Opposition in New Democracies 6. Parliamentary Opposition in Post-Communist Democracies: Power of the Powerless Petr Kopecky and Maria Spirova 7. Parliamentary Opposition in Non-Parliamentary Regimes: Latin America Scott Morgenstern, Juan Javier Negri and Anibal Perez-Linan 8. Parliamentary Opposition after Apartheid: South Africa Robert A. Schrire 9. Parliamentary Opposition and its Alternatives in a Transnational Regime: The European Union in Perspective Ludger Helms Conclusion 10. Making Sense of Opposition Philip Norton
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".