MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W374672838

Migrants and the Courts: A Century of Trial and Error?

2013· book· en· W374672838 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Geoffrey Care

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTribunalRefugeeCredibilityIndex (typography)State (computer science)Political scienceLawPublic administrationHistoryEconomic history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contents: Foreword, The Rt Hon Sir Stephen Sedley Preface Laying the foundations From the Home Office to the Lord Chancellor's Department The development of the tribunal structures Getting the facts - interpreting the evidence, credibility What price state security? (with Frances Webber) How other countries do it: Belgium, North Africa, South Africa and Sweden, (with Katelijne Declerck, Amor Boubakri, Ahmed Arbee and GA ran Hakansson) How other countries do it - Canada: the evolution and development of the refugee determination system in Canada and the Balanced Refugee Reform Act (with James C. Simeon) Afterword Appendices Bibliography Index.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.066
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.182
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0660.182
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0130.052
Scholarly communication0.0270.032
Open science0.0050.008
Research integrity0.0150.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEuropean and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207