MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W37497728 · doi:10.1242/jeb.245583

Manufacturing with Nanoparticle Sprays and Beams

2006· article· en· W37497728 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Steven L. Girshick, Peter H. McMurry, J. Heberlein, W. W. Gerberich, C. B. Carter, William Mook, J. Hafiz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsNanoparticleNanotechnologyMicrofabricationMaterials scienceDeposition (geology)TandemComputer scienceFabricationComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technologies that integrate the synthesis of nanoparticles and their controlled deposition onto surfaces will likely play an important role in the development of nanoparticle-based manufacturing. This NIRT project involves an integrated program of research and education that will lead to a fundamental toolkit for manufacturing with nanoparticle sprays and focused beams, illustrated in Figure 1. Nanoparticle sprays, in tandem with a high-rate nanoparticle synthesis process, can be used to coat relatively large areas with nanoparticles. Focused nanoparticle beams, in concert with standard microfabrication techniques, can be used to deposit lines or patterns, or to build three-dimensional objects, made out of nanoparticles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.146
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207