Bibliographic record
Abstract
La vie et le role des esclaves a la Reunion dans la 1ere moitie du XIXe siecle sont au coeur d'un sujet qui inclut d'autres terres d'esclavage et d'autres formes de travail. L'accent est mis sur l'etude de la traite illegale et celle des revoltes serviles, voies d'acces vers une histoire du silence. A ce silence, pesant jusqu'aux annees 1960, a succede chez les Reunionnais la volonte de parler de l'esclavage et de l'etudier. Notre demarche est donc historiographique, attentive au regard des contemporains, friande de lectures au second degre et d'oralite. Le champ couvert va des origines du peuplement a nos jours, seul moyen d'elucider des notions telles que celle de Noirs blanc et de Blancs noirs ou le fait que des travailleurs agricoles soient vus - et se considerent - comme esclaves au XXe (qui saisit la pioche est saisi par elle). Ombre de l'esclavage longtemps nefaste, desormais revendiquee : instrumentalise, le marronnage est ainsi devenu lutte pour l'egalite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".