Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'instruction Musicam sacram fut promulguee par la Sacree Congregation des Rites en 1967. Quarante ans plus tard, l'auteur suggere qu'il est utile de revoir cette instruction, seul document portant sur la musique emis par le Saint Siege apres le Deuxieme Concile du Vatican et encore considere par certains comme le seul guide officiel sur la musique du Novus ordo de PaulVI. L'auteur souligne certaines difficultes avec cette opinion puisque le Novus ordo n'existait pas dans son entier lorsque l'instruction fut promulguee et est donc plus adequatement compris comme etant un commentaire de l'Ordo Missae (une forme modifiee du Rite tridentin) en vigueur a ce temps-la. L'auteur examine le contexte historique du document, suggere une interpretation correcte et explore les differentes formes litteraires du texte. Il est d'avis que les declarations et les principes theologiques de la Constitution sur la Sainte Liturgie valent encore alors que de nouvelles lois ont abroge ou deroge en grande partie des normes juridiques. Il conclut que ce document devrait encore servir pour definir le role de la musique dans le culte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".