MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Las Constituciones de 1812 y 1814. Un cuadro comparativo en materia político-electoral.

2010· article· en· W37931972 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marco Antonio Pérez de los Reyes

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Justicia Electoral · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsConstitutionPolitical scienceDecreeHumanitiesIndependence (probability theory)MonarchyPoliticsLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolEl presente trabajo realiza una comparacion de las constituciones de 1812 y 1814: a) la Constitucion Politica de la Monarquia Espanola y, b) el Decreto Constitucional para la libertad de la America Mexicana. En el trabajo se revisan y contrastan los aspectos politico-electorales con el proposito de impulsar la reflexion que puedan merecer en el animo de la conmemoracion del Bicentenario del inicio de la Independencia nacional. EnglishThis paper compares both the constitution of 1812 and the constitution of 1814; being these: a) the Constitution of the Spanish monarchy, and b) the Constitutional Decree for the freedom of Mexican America. Here, a review is made comparing the political and electoral issues in order to encourage what may deserve a closer approach in the spirit of bicentennial conmemoration of national independence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Justicia ElectoralSame topicHistorical Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207