The Improvement of Water and Water-Dependent Resources under the Great Lakes Charter Annex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1985, the eight Great Lakes Governors and the Premiers of Ontario and Quebec signed the Great Lakes Charter, a non-binding agreement for managing Great Lakes water resources. 2 The overarching objectives of the Charter are "to protect and conserve the [water] levels and flows ... [and] the environmental balance of the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem" while also "provid[ing] a secure foundation for future investment and development within the region" through cooperative management. 3 Principle IV of the Charter declared the signatories' intent with respect to diversions of water from the Basin:No Great Lakes State or Province will approve or permit any major new or increased diversion or consumptive use of Great Lakes water without the consent and concurrence of all affected Great Lakes States and Provinces. 4 For the most part, the Charter, along with the federal Water Resources Development Act of 19865 and the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909,6 have been sufficient to serve the needs of this temperate region
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".