MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W381863104

Analyse des mesures de l'expérience satellitaire SAGE III : algorithme d'inversion et validation des résultats. Comparaison des produits des instruments de la mission spatiale ACE avec des mesures corrélatives à distance et in situ.

2003· preprint· fr· W381863104 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. Tétard

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2003
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesForestryArtGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the conclusions of the last IPCC report (2007) is that the comprehension of climate change is still incomplete. In particular, the role of the stratosphere is not well known ; that is why it is important to study its composition and the physical and chemical processes in the stratosphere. Solar occultation measurements (like SAGE III) and in situ measurements are particularly appropriate for these studies. In this thesis, we have studied the consistency of the existing measurements. My work consists of the inversion of SAGE III transmissions in order to obtain vertical profiles of ozone and nitrogen dioxide concentrations and of aerosol extinction coefficients in nine channels between 385 and 1545 nm. In the channels around 450 nm, a vertical smoothing of the tangent transmissions is required to compensate for the problem of spectral neutrality of the attenuator. In the 1545 nm channel, CO2 absorption is computed using MODTRAN 5. The uncertainties are evaluated using a Monte Carlo method. SAGE III products obtained by our algorithm are compared to official products (NASA), to products from another algorithm developped in St. Petersburg and to coincident measurements from the SAGE II and POAM III sensors. Globally, these comparisons show that the SAGE III products from my LOA algorithm are of good quality. However, a comparison performed with data from the balloon-borne instrument SPIRALE (in situ measurements) on the edge of the polar vortex shows a good agreement between ozone and a disagreement for NO2. This disagreement shows that in complex dynamical situations, the solar occultation method for reactive species (such as NO2) is not well suited. Furthermore, diurnal variations of NO2 complicate the comparisons between remote sensing measurements and in situ ones. A specific study concerning aerosol resulting from forest fires in the western Canada (August 2003) has been done using official SAGE III data. Intrusions of biomass burning aerosols in the lower stratosphere by pyroconvection could be the reason for the increase in aerosol extinction coefficients in the lower stratosphere observed in SAGE III events. We have deduced the microphysical properties of these aerosols from the SAGE III measurements and showed that the increase in the aerosol extinction coefficient was caused by an increase in the number of particles in the lower stratosphere. Nevertheless, the chemical composition of these aerosols could not be deduced from the SAGE III measurements because extinction measurements are not sensitive enough to the refraction index. Since the end of the SAGE II, SAGE III and POAM III missions, the ACE-SCISAT instruments along with the SOFIE instrument are the only solar occultation instruments providing informations on the stratosphere. Thus, we have studied the consistency between ACE data and SAGE II, SAGE III and SPIRALE data. This work is carried out within the framework of the international validation campaign. We have shown that aerosol extinction coefficients retrieved using IMAGER data are in disagreement with those retrieved using SAGE II and SAGE III and that the ozone and NO2 volume mixing ratio from FTS and MAESTRO are in a good agreement with SAGE III data. However, we find also discrepancies between NO2 retrieved by ACE and that retrieved by SPIRALE although the other species retrieved using FTS (CH4, N2O, HNO3, O3, HCl) and MAESTRO (O3) are in a good agreement with SPIRALE data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→French-language works237,207→