MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W38204736

Time-lapse seismic imaging of enhanced coalbed methane production: a numerical modelling study

2002· article· en· W38204736 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah E. Richardson, Don C. Lawton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoalbed methanePetroleum engineeringCoal miningCoalGeologyDewateringMethaneCarbon sequestrationGreenhouse gasHydraulic fracturingMining engineeringCarbon dioxideEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringWaste managementEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coalbed methane (CBM) production relies on dewatering coal seams to allow gas flow, and the injection of carbon dioxide to maintain effective reservoir pressure. Injection of carbon dioxide into CBM strata also serves as an effective method of subsurface greenhouse gas sequestration. Both dewatering and gas injection alter the acoustic impedance and hence reflectivity of coal strata. Physical tests and numerical modelling suggest that time-lapse seismic imaging may be used effectively to image the changes in a coalbed methane reservoir that result from CBM production. Seismic responses of coal seams change due to differences in the acoustic impedance of the coal, and decreased velocities within coal zones results in delayed reflections from deeper horizons. Modelling provides “proof of concept”, and provides parameters to be considered in survey design prior to a field trial involving the Ardley coal zone in Alberta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→