MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3826633 · doi:10.1021/ac00128a010

Prolactin elevation to 16,630 mU/l in a case of a large non-functioning pituitary adenoma

2002· article· en· W3826633 on OpenAlexaff
Akheel A. Syed, David Mathias, Shahid Wahid, K. Hall, Jolanta U. Weaver

Bibliographic record

Venue21st Joint Meeting of the British Endocrine Societies · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsLMC Diabetes & Endocrinology (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProlactinElevation (ballistics)MedicinePituitary adenomaInternal medicineEndocrinologyAdenomaHormoneAstronomyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An 18-year old male presented with galactorrhoaea and obesity. PRL measured 16,630 mU/l, FSH 6.0 U/l, LH 5.0 U/l, testosterone 8.6 nmol/l, SHBG 15.0 nmol/l, IGF-1 22.0 nmol/l and TSH 1.39 mU/l. Several 24-hour urinary free cortisol estimations excluded hypercortisolism. Short synacthen test confirmed an intact HPA axis. Visual fields were full. Pituitary-MRI revealed a large adenoma extending into the right cavernous sinus without suprasellar extension. PRL started declining upon commencing bromocriptine and at 3 months had fallen to 1,504 mU/l. This was associated with severe headaches and visual disturbance. The dose of bromocriptine was reduced to slow down the presumed rapid shrinkage of prolactinoma. Subsequent MRI failed to confirm significant tumour shrinkage or apoplexy. Over the next year bromocriptine was tolerated only in small doses on account of the headaches, and was replaced with cabergoline. Tumour-size diminished to a moderate degree while prolactin levels settled to < 800 mU/l over a further two years of follow-up with regular imaging. Trans-sphenoidal adenomectomy was undertaken to define the histopathology of the tumour in view of the atypical clinical course. Histology revealed chromophobe cells with negative staining for PRL, ACTH, FSH, LH, GH and TSH. Unfortunately, but not unexpectedly, the hyperprolactinaemia recurred within 12 months of surgery accompanied by tumour regrowth. Anterior pituitary function (ACTH and TSH reserve) remained intact. Cabergoline was reintroduced with satisfactory control of hyperprolactinaemia and sex steroid reserve. Further therapeutic options - medical vs. pituitary fossa clearance and/or radiotherapy - and possible complications were discussed with the patient; he opted for dopamine-agonist therapy. This is the first reported case of a significant prolactin elevation in the range pathognomonic of lactotroph macroadenoma associated with NFPA. Histological diagnosis is essential in the presence of an atypical clinical course as demonstrated in this case. Further management of our patient remains difficult.Severe hyperprolactinaemia (PRL > 8,000 mU/l) is almost always due to a prolactinoma, and biochemical response to dopamine-agonist therapy in the presence of radiographic evidence of an adenoma is often regarded as sufficient confirmation. Our case is the first report of an exception to this rule. Definitive treatment engenders jeopardising pituitary function which has survived intact pre- and post- surgery, limiting future therapeutic options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue21st Joint Meeting of the British Endocrine Societies→Same topicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→