Les effets d’une activité de remédiation cognitive groupale sur les difficultés d’apprentissage liées au développement moral
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous travaillons sur la remediation cognitive engagee avec des enfants en echec scolaire du fait de problemes lies au developpement moral. La recherche se refere a Piaget, mais pas seulement, dans la mesure ou elle s’appuie sur des travaux soit inspires des recherches de cet auteur, soit sur d’autres perspectives complementaires des precedentes. L’objectif a ete d’etablir une facon de travailler favorisant des vecus de cooperation et promouvant des situations facilitant l’autonomie des enfants. L’activite de remediation a dure 6 mois, 21 enfants de 3 ecoles de Lyon y ont participe en petits groupes. Une passation pour l’evaluation des domaines cognitif, moral et psycho-affectif est intervenue avant et apres la remediation. Un entretien avec les parents et une fiche d’observation remplie par les enseignants completent la recherche, qui vise au diagnostic, a la prevention et a la remediation de l’echec scolaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".