MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3848118

Analysis of the Molecular Mechanism of Autophagosome Formation in the Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae.

2010· article· en· W3848118 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jiefei Geng

Bibliographic record

VenueDeep Blue (University of Michigan) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNankai UniversityUniversity of TorontoNational Institutes of HealthLouisiana State University
KeywordsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeYeastMechanism (biology)AutophagosomeChemistryCell biologyAutophagyBiologyBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a lysosomal/vacuolar degradative pathway conserved in eukaryotic organisms, autophagy mediates the turnover of long-lived proteins and excess or aberrant organelles. During autophagy, a double-membrane vesicle, the autophagosome, envelops part of the cytoplasm and delivers it to the lysosome/vacuole for breakdown and eventual recycling of the degradation products. Genetic screening in yeast has led to the identification of over 30 autophagy-related (ATG) genes and most of them are involved in the autophagosome formation process. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, most Atg proteins reside at the phagophore assembly site (PAS), which is involved in autophagosome biogenesis. One reason of our limited understanding of the PAS function is the lack of stoichiometric information regarding the Atg proteins at this site. In this dissertation, we describe a fluorescence microscopy-based method to study the quantitative properties of Atg proteins at the PAS. We found that in response to autophagy induction, the amount of most Atg proteins remains unchanged at the PAS whereas we see an enhanced recruitment of Atg8 and Atg9 at this site. This method is applicable to many related studies and will provide a new way to study the property and functions of Atg proteins. Another essential issue in autophagy that has not been resolved is the origin of the lipids that form the autophagosome. We showed that two post-Golgi proteins, Sec2 and Sec4, are required for autophagy. The known function of Sec2 and Sec4 is to direct secretory vesicles from the Golgi to the secretion site on the plasma membrane. In sec2 and sec4 conditional mutant yeast, the anterograde movement of Atg9, a proposed membrane carrier, is impaired during starvation conditions. Similarly, in the sec2 mutant, Atg8 is inefficiently recruited to the PAS, resulting in the generation of fewer autophagosomes. We propose that following autophagy induction the function of Sec2 and Sec4 are diverted to direct membrane flow to autophagosome formation. In summary, most of the work presented in the dissertation is related to the autophagosome formation process and its regulation mechanism. It can inspire new questions and will be the cornerstone for future analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDeep Blue (University of Michigan)→Same topicBiofuel production and bioconversion→French-language works237,207→