MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W38648633 · doi:10.2196/50032

Tussen de Oude en de Nieuwe Wereld: De Verovering van de Canarische Eilanden

2013· dissertation· nl· W38648633 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
W.J. Pronk

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2013
Typedissertation
Languagenl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Systems and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Door de Canarische veroveringen apart te beschouwen, en niet als tussenstop in de verovering van Amerika, wordt in deze scriptie het gesimplificeerde beeld dat geschetst wordt in tal van algemene werken over de vroegmoderne koloniale geschiedenis van Spanje, genuanceerd. Daarnaast geeft de scriptie inzicht in het ingewikkelde en snelveranderende karakter van het Spaans Imperialisme met betrekking tot de Canarische Eilanden, door de volgende vraag te beantwoorden:\nWaarom hebben de Spanjaarden de Canarische Eilanden veroverd en hoe is het belang \tvan de eilanden veranderd door de ontdekking van Columbus in 1492?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.102
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.102
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0190.015
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0050.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1770.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.547
Teacher spread0.416 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicPolitical Systems and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207