Alan Lomax en Louisiane : les hauts et les bas d’un chercheur de terrain1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article ne prétend pas repenser ici le travail considérable de ceux qui ont récemment étudié la vie et l’oeuvre de John et d’Alan Lomax sur les plans national et international. Il se limite plutôt à l’impact des Lomax en Louisiane française, surtout d’Alan, personnage qui se montrait à la fois inspirant et intimidant, frustrant et fascinant. Pendant les années 1930, John et Alan Lomax ont parcouru ce pays dans le but de réaliser des enregistrements de musique traditionnelle pour la Library of Congress . Leurs enregistrements sont devenus la base de l’Archive of Folk Song à la Library of Congress , véritable bijou de la musique traditionnelle des États-Unis. On dit d’Alan Lomax que ses observations étaient brillantes, tandis que ses interprétations passaient quelquefois à côté de la question. L’exposé ne cherche ni à glorifier ni à avilir, mais à reconnaître dûment le mérite et la critique dans la mesure où ils s’appliquent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".