MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Food allergy and anaphylaxis – 2049. Evolution of food allergy in a high risk population: the Canadian asthma primary prevention study (CAPPS)

2013· article· en· W39041656 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Allergy Organization Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeanut allergyFood allergyAllergyEgg allergyAsthmaPopulationSensitizationPediatricsOral food challengeAnaphylaxisCohortEnvironmental healthImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article was originally published online on 23 April 2013 Food allergy is on the rise. It is often assumed that allergy in early life to milk and egg often resolves whereas this is less frequent with peanut. CAPPS is a high risk allergy and asthma birth cohort. 545 families were enrolled during pregnancy in Winnipeg and Vancouver, Canada. Study participants were prenatally randomized into a multifaceted modified diet, lifestyle and environment intervention group or control group. Questionnaires were completed prenatally and when the children were assessed by a Pediatric Allergist at 1, 2, 7 and 15 years of age. Assessments included skin testing to common inhalant and ingestant (milk, egg and peanut) allergens. A positive skin test was defined as having a mean wheal diameter ≥ 3mm. At age 1, 3.4% (16/474) of children were sensitized to milk, 9.1% (43/474) to egg and 5.3% (25/474) to peanut. At age 15, 1.6% (5/321) were sensitized to milk, 1.9% (6/321) to egg and 10.9% (35/321) peanut. At age 15, 100% of children sensitized to milk and egg at age 1 were no longer sensitized to those foods. Interestingly 64% (16/25) of the children sensitized to peanut at age 1 outgrew sensitization to peanut at age 15. New food sensitizations developed between the ages of 1 and 15. Sensitization to peanut at age 1 does have an increased risk of sensitization to peanut at age 15 (OR=9.4, 95% CI 3.6-25.0). However, sensitization to peanut at age 2 has the greatest likelihood of persistence (OR=35.8, 95% CI 14.0-91.9). At age 15, 5.6% of those tested (18/322) had developed sensitization to peanut after age 7 while 3% (10/322) of those sensitized at age 7 to peanut were no longer skin test positive. Similarly from age 7 to 15, 1.6% (5/322) became sensitized to milk and 1.6% (5/322) became sensitized to egg. Food sensitization to milk, egg and peanut decrease over time. The greatest likelihood for persistent peanut sensitization is seen with a positive skin test at age 2. Risk factors for new sensitization and factors associated with the loss of sensitization need to be defined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it