Bibliographic record
Abstract
siesta de Pirandello (1996) y Cary Grant (1997).Escalante irrumpió en la escena teatral mexicana con Fedra y otras griegas en el año 2002.Este texto se ha estrenado en Canadá (Ottawa, Quebec y Montreal), Nueva York, Francia (París y Lyon), Atenas y Bogotá.A partir del 2004 destacan las escenificaciones de Yo también quiero un profeta (2004), Colette (2005), La piel (2006), Andrómaca Real (2006) y Electra despierta (2009), entre otros títulos, con una sobresaliente recepción crítica del público.En sus propias palabras: "llevo una década produciendo, publicando y representando obras ininterrumpidamente -desde 2002 hasta el 2010 he tenido todos los años al menos tres obras en escena-en México y en otros países". 1La presente entrevista tomó lugar en el café El Péndulo de la colonia Roma, en la ciudad de México, el lunes 29 de julio del 2013.Buena parte de la conversación versó sobre la escenificación de sus textos más recientes, Las relaciones (sexuales) de Shakespeare (y Marlowe) y Tennessee en cuerpo y alma. 2Primer acto ¿Qué maestros/as consideras fundamentales en tu formación?¿Cuáles consideras tus influencias literarias?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".