Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microplastics are an emerging anthropogenic pollutant risk with a significant body of research dedicated to understanding the implications further. To generate the databases required to characterize the impact of microplastics on our environment, and improve recovery and recycling of current plastic materials, we need rapid, in-line characterization that can distinguish individual polymer types. Here, autofluorescence spectroscopy was investigated as an alternative characterization method to the current leading techniques based on vibrational spectroscopy. It was confirmed that the autofluorescence of seven common textile polymers (acrylic, polyester, nylon, polyethylene, polypropylene, cellulose/cotton, wool) arose due to the cluster-triggered emission phenomenon. Both simulated polymer aging <i>via</i> photooxidation and dyeing of the polymers were found to affect the resultant autofluorescence spectra. A total of 1485 spectra from 39 unique sample groups (polymer type, colour, and degree of photooxidation) were analysed <i>via</i> machine learning (k-means cluster analysis). Correct identification of the polymer type was achieved in 71% of the cases from only eight input values (normalized intensity values at three autofluorescence emission wavelengths, the total autofluorescence emission intensity, the sample RGB colour values, and the sample shape). This represents a significant step towards automated polymer identification at the sub-second time scales required for the in-line characterization of microplastics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".