MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W394382117

Правовой анализ Курекчайского договора 1805 года между Ибрагим-ханом Карабахским и договоров 1813 года (Гюлистанский), 1828 года (Туркменчайский), заключенных между Российской империей и Персией

2009· article· ru· W394382117 on OpenAlex
Гусейнов Солтан Сардар-Оглы

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueИзвестия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А. И. Герцена · 2009
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Near East History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)Quarter (Canadian coin)PoliticsPolitical scienceEmpireDemocracyOttoman empireThe RepublicHistoryEconomic historyLawGeographyAncient historyArchaeologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author of the article carries out a legal and political analysis of three most important treaties between the Russian Empire and state formations of Northern Azerbaijan of the first quarter of the 19th century. These three treaties became key regulatory sources of state legal life of Northern Azerbaijan for more than half a century until 1918 when the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic was founded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0140.015
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.009
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0130.011
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0140.004
Research integrity0.0070.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.084

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it