MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W394566592 · doi:10.1520/stp14507s

Fail-safe Approach for the V-22 Composite Proprotor Yoke

2001· book-chapter· en· W394566592 on OpenAlexaff
LK Altman, D. Jeevan Pradsad Reddy, H. W. Moore

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsBell Helicopter Textron (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYoke (aeronautics)Composite numberComputer scienceMaterials scienceReliability engineeringStructural engineeringComposite materialEngineeringSimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The V-22 proprotor yoke is fabricated from filament-wound unidirectional glass/epoxy belts that react to centrifugal force (CF) loads and beam and chord bending loads. Fiberglass tape is laid up at off-axis orientation between the unidirectional belts to react shear loads. The structural criteria for both metallic and composite V-22 dynamically loaded rotor components specify that these components be fatigue tested and analyzed to show a “safe life” of 30 000 h. Based on the fatigue test results of prototype and production proprotor yokes, a safe life of 30 000 h for the composite proprotor yoke could not be substantiated. However, testing of the yoke was continued beyond delamination initiation. The V-22 proprotor yoke continued to carry load in the fatigue tests with significant delaminations within the composite structure. These results, in addition to similar test results produced by Bell Helicopter Textron on composite proprotor yokes for commercially produced aircraft, indicate that it will be possible to substantiate this component using a “fail-safe” methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCombustion and Detonation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207