Justesse du savoir pratique : des couleurs aux angströms dans la fabrication de circuits intégrés. Qualifications des ouvriers et des ingénieurs dans une industrie de pointe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Faire le point sur la qualification professionnelle dans une industrie de pointe conduit à se pencher sur la création des connaissances techniques, sur leur appropriation et leur diffusion dans les activités quotidiennes. Cette étude ethnographique permet: 1) de décrire les compétences techniques associées aux qualifications des ouvrier(e)s et des ingénieurs en comparant leurs points communs et leurs différences en réponse à la question : Quelle est la relation entre qualifications et compétences d'une part, et le partage du savoir entre groupes professionnels dans l'organisation du travail d'autre part? L'organisation du travail coordonne et délimite les connaissances techniques - description de postes et savoir tacite - qu'ouvriers et ingénieurs peuvent acquérir par leurs expériences de travail. L'analyse précise ainsi les concepts de qualification et organisation proposés par E. O. Wright.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".