MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W395603784

You do have choices : a practical guide to financial decisions for women of all ages

2000· book· en· W395603784 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charmaine Spencer, L. J. Zimmerman

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2000
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reliable information is an important source of financial power for women of all ages. Throughout your life, you make a wide range of financial and other decisions that have a long lasting impact on your future security. Perhaps you are making decisions right now without realizing that you have many choices. We wrote this booklet to help remedy that information gap. We hope it will guide you in planning a more secure financial future. The information in this booklet is for you whether you are in the labour force, self-employed, or do unpaid work at home. Whether or not you work for pay, you need to know about income security programs and how your husband or partner's decisions will affect your life.Contents: Introduction; PART ONE - When You Are In A Relationship: Living Common-law; How a Relationship Can Affect You Financially; If Your Relationship Breaks Down-Separation and Divorce; Child Support; Spousal Support; Dividing Assets; Dividing Pension Benefits; Dividing Canada Pension Plan Benefits. PART TWO-When You Are in the Work Force: Employment Trends; Time Out From Paid Work; What Working Women Need To Know; Employment Standards; Union Agreements; Planning While You Are Working; Keeping Your Skills Sharp; Job Counselling. PART THREE-When You Are Out of Work: Employment Insurance (El); Social Assistance. PART FOUR-Planning Your Retirement: Deciding When to Retire; What's Available When You Retire; Government Benefits; Old Age Security; Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS); Spouse's Allowance & the Widowed Spouse's Allowance; Canada Pension Plan; Regular Retirement Benefits; Survivor & Death Benefits; Applying Early for CPP; Workplace Pensions (Registered Pension Plans); Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSPs); Key Points to Remember; Working Together for Change. Conclusion. Resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2040.158

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)Same topicGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsFrench-language works237,207